《食品与发酵工业》编辑部关于

加强科学道德规范营造良好学术氛围的声明

 

        为加强科技道德规范，促进科研诚信，维护学术活动的严肃性和声誉，营造学术期刊良好的学术氛围，培养良好的学术生态环境，《食品与发酵工业》编辑部依据中国科协2012年印发的《中国科协所属全国学会科技期刊关于加强科技期刊科学道德规范营造良好学术氛围的联合声明》的通知精神，郑重发此声明。

　　一、注重科学道德建设，弘扬创新精神

　　 坚持开拓创新，促进学术交流，服务科研生产，积极推动科技进步；努力传播科学知识，率先垂范成为先进文化的实践者；注重科技人才培养，推动专业技术人才科学素质和创新能力的提升；加强职业道德修养，提倡追求真理、实事求是、团结协作、诚实劳动的优良品质，提高科研诚信意识，为繁荣我国科技事业而积极努力工作。

　　二、开展学术诚信教育，规范学术行为

　　 充分尊重作者权益，对存在署名有争议，引用他人著述未注明出处，以及抄袭、剽窃、弄虚作假等学术不端行为的文章，坚决拒绝刊登。一经发现，视情节轻重给予书面警告、拒绝刊登有其署名的稿件、通知其所在单位等处理。

   作者应经《食品与发酵工业》官方网络采编平台（http://spfx.cbpt.cnki.net)

进行投稿，作者投来的稿件应是首发稿，严禁一稿两投。投稿成功后，系统会自动对稿件进行学术不端检测，文字复制比超过30%的作退稿处理。

　　三、加强编审者队伍建设，恪守职业道德

  加强同行评议建设。发挥期刊编委会和审稿专家作用，严格稿件学术质量审查规范，客观、公正对待所有稿件。建立明确的审稿、撤稿及发布制度，维护学术记录的真实性和准确性。

  如发现已发表的论文存在弄虚作假、抄袭剽窃或严重差错等问题，会在最短的时间内，采取及时发布撤稿声明、更正启事或公开致歉信等方式进行纠正，并通知收录有关文章的数据库予以撤稿。如发现审稿人利用审稿谋取私利乃至剽窃所审稿件内容时，将根据情节轻重分别采取警告、禁止其为我刊审稿乃至公开披露等处理措施。

   我刊目前采用同行专家匿名评审的方式进行审查，在编辑部与稿件无任何利益矛盾和冲突的前提下，只接受审稿结果充分确定的稿件，保证审稿结果的客观性和公正性。

审稿人不得有针对作者本人的评价和批评，审稿意见应论据充分、论点明确，评论应客观、公正。审稿人应遵从本刊同行专家匿名评审的规则，未经主编和编辑部授权，稿件信息不得公开或与他人讨论，保证审稿结果的保密性。审稿人自觉保持审稿进程的高效性，尽早负责地给出审稿结果。如果审稿人认为自身无法胜任指定稿件的审查或无法提供及时的审稿结果，应及时通知编辑部。审稿专家应指出稿件中应引用而未被引用的参考文献，确保稿件论点的正确性和创新性。发现稿件中任何与其他出版物的大量相似或重叠之处，审稿人应及时与编辑部进行沟通。

 

　　四、明确署名责任权利，严格遵循职业规范

　　所有论文署名作者均应对论文工作做出过实质性贡献，并对文章负责。论文投稿前，所有署名作者均须对稿件的全部研究内容进行审查，确保结果准确可靠，确保不存在学术不端行为，并同意署名及共同作者的署名排序。署名作者应对为此项研究做出过某种贡献的合作人员和机构予以感谢。论文发表时，应对非涉密研究项目获得的经费支持及来源予以标明。论文作者应明确说明使用或引用他人的工作，如果发现已投递或发表的文章中存有问题，应有责任和义务及时予以修正或提出撤回。

   作者上传的研究论文必须有创新性；立论科学，论点明确，推理严谨；词语准确，文字精练，数据可靠；插图具有高清晰性和可读性；内容充实完整；遵从国家法定计量单位、数字用法、标点符号及其他标准。

五、切实发挥编辑作用，保障书刊科研质量

  在稿件付印之前，编辑部需对录用稿件进行编辑、加工，必要时需与作者针对稿件中的规范性等问题进行沟通。发现本刊已出版论文的重大问题，经编辑委员会、编辑部及审稿专家的一致讨论，根据相关人员达成的共识，必要时发表对已出版物进行更正、澄清、撤销及道歉的声明。

 

六、版权转让约定

  论文的著作权属于作者，文责由作者自负。为了保证作者的署名权和知识产权，作者在采编平台上进行网络投稿时，在《版权转让协议》环节上点击“同意”。本刊编辑部对来稿有文字修改权，对所发稿有版权。论文发表后，作者同意将该论文的著作权自动转让给编辑部，包括电子出版、多媒体出版、网络出版及以其他形式出版的权利。作者如果不允许本刊对稿件作文字性及内容删改，或不同意论文的转载、摘编、收录，请在投稿时声明。

  以上约定和措施自公布之日起执行。编辑部全体编辑人员、编辑委员会全体成员、作者、审稿专家及社会公众具有对以上约定和措施实行监管和监督的权力。

《食品与发酵工业》编辑部

2015/8/19

 

The declaration of enhancing scientific ethics and developing good academic environments from the editorial office of the Journal of Food and Fermentation Industries 

 

To strengthen ethical practices in science and technology, promote research integrity, safeguard the reputation of academic activities, and develop an academic atmosphere conducive to the creation of academic journals, the editorial office of the journal of Food and Fermentation Industries solemnly made this declaration, in accordance with the spirit of《The joint declaration made by the National Academy regarding strengthening scientific moral norms and creating good academic environments》, printed by the Chinese Scientific Association in 2012.

 

1 Focus on the ethics of science and develop innovative spirit 

Emphasize exploring innovations; promote academic exchanges; promote scientific research production; actively support scientific advancement; propagate scientific knowledge; set advanced scientific practice standards; cultivate technological skill personnel; improve overall quality and innovative ability; strengthen the cultivation of occupational ethics, develop pragmatic practices, promote cooperation, improve awareness of academic honesty, and actively further prosperity of our national scientific career.

2 Educate academic integrity and promote disciplined academic behavior 

With respect to author’s interests, the publication of articles will be declined in the following conditions: dispute over signatory of the article, lack of relevant citations and references for quoting other papers, plagiarism, falsification, and any other dishonorable behaviors. Once discovered, a written notification will

be issued to the author’s organization, warning the publication declination in accordance with the severity of the transgression. 

Authors should contribute their manuscripts through the online collection and editing platform (http://spfx.cbpt.cnki.net). The manuscript should be contributed to only one journal. After submission, the system will automatically go through a similarity/plagiarism check. The manuscript will be rejected if the percentage of direct copying exceeds 30 percent.

3 Strengthen the construction of reviewer committees, to ensure adherence to professional ethics

Strengthen the peer review system to promote impartial review. Delegate the roles of editing

committee and expert reviewer. Tighten objectively and impartially, the paper quality and inspective norms. Establish a clear and specific system for reviewing，approving，and repealing manuscripts. Maintain the authenticity and accuracy of academic records.  

A published paper discovered to contain falsifications, plagiarism or significant error will be disposed of within the minimum time by making a repealing declaration, corrective notice，or a public apology, and also inform the database to repeal acceptance of the manuscript.

This journal uses a blind peer-reviewing method to monitor manuscripts. To avoid conflict of interest between the editorial office and the author of a manuscript, only manuscripts with approval from an impartial peer reviewer will be considered for publication to guarantee impartiality and objectivity.

Reviewers should not rate or criticize the author of a manuscript. Comments should have a clear argument and adequate evidence; comments should be objective and impartial.

Reviewers should conform to the rules of blind peer-reviewing. The manuscript cannot be discussed with other parties without the permission of the editor in chief and the editorial office, in order to ensure the confidentiality of the results from review. The reviewer should be conscientious of the efficiency of the

reviewing process and provide the review results as soon as possible to the editing office. The expert reviewer should point out unreferenced literature, and ensure the accuracy of the arguments in the manuscripts. Reviewers should inform the editing office if the manuscript presented has a large percentage of

similarity or overlap with other published works.

4 Clarify the responsibility and right of signatories, strictly conform to professional norms

All the authors should make concrete contribution to the work of academic theses and take responsibility for their papers. Before the submission of the manuscript, all the authors should have a complete check of the manuscript to ensure its accuracy and reliability, remove any dishonorable attributes, and agree on the

order of the collective authors. The authors should express gratitude to the coworkers of the project who made a contribution to the research. When the paper is published, the fund used for the research of the project should be indicated.

Authors should clearly indicate the quotation of other works. If there are any problems in the submission process, authors are obligated to make corrections or propose a withdrawal in time. 

The uploaded research paper must have original, innovative research, logical points, clear arguments,

rigorous lines of reasoning, accurate phrasing, concise context, reliable data，clear and legible illustration, and rich and complete content. The usage of measurement units, figures, punctuation, and other standards should be in accordance with the relevant national regulations.

5 Exert the editorial role to guarantee the quality of scientific research papers. 

Before the manuscripts are printed, they must be edited and processed by the editing office. The editing office may contact the author to discuss normative problems if necessary. If there are significant problems in the published paper, the editorial office will decide whether a correction, clarification, withdrawal, or

apologizing declaration should be made for the published paper based on a consensus reached by related personnel and the discussion of the editing department, editorial committee, and expert reviewers.

6 Agreement on transferring the possession of theses

Authors own copyright of the paper and are also solely responsible for the paper. In order to ensure the signature right and intellectual property the authors, authors should click “agree” in the agreement of transferring copyright when submission.

This editorial office has the right to make literal correction for the paper that will be published. After the publication of the paper, the authors will agree to transfer the authorship to the editorial office including e-journal，multimedia publisher, network publisher and other forms of publication right. The authors

should declare when contributing, if the author does not allow adjustment or content correction of the paper.

The above agreement will be come into place from the date of issuance of this declaration. The full crew of the editing department, committee, authors, expert reviewers and the public has the right to monitor and inspect the above agreements.

 

The editorial office of 《food and fermentation industries》

2015/8/19